Where we keep an eye on the goings-on in the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame Foundation: what is, what isn't, what could be, what should be, what oughtn't be, etc.
Sunday, December 12, 2021
Eine Kleine Fanfic: A Rock Hall 2021 Playlist Wars Playlist
Sunday, November 28, 2021
Thoughts on the 2021 induction ceremony
Much has been said about the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame induction ceremony for the Class Of 2021, and I hope my thoughts won't be too redundant. My hope is to say things that haven't already been said; so if I blow right by one segment of the ceremony, it isn't that it wasn't enjoyable or edifying, it's just that I don't have any new observations. Also, I only got to watch the ceremony twice these past nine days. I really thought they would keep airing it across the various HBO channels throughout this week like they did with the special last year. They haven't been. Maybe I'll catch it again soon. Maybe I can bring it up On Demand. My memory may miss a step or two; bear with me.
Carole King: To me, this was the most disappointing, compared to what I would have hoped or wanted. Untapped potential. Taylor did a great job, as did Jennifer Hudson and Carole herself. For me, the problem was the overall handling of it. Carole King is one of the two most quintessential singer/songwriters of the 1970s that are responsible for the connotations we still have to this day of what it means to be a "singer/songwriter." But so much of her segment seemed to dwell on the latter part of that label. It was almost like they were recycling her 1990 Non-Performer induction merits and reusing them this time. The video package did a good job of showing the performing part of her legacy. Taylor's speech mentioned the singing and how it resonated with her, but there were several lines in the later part of her speech that were ambiguous and could just have easily been said at King's 1990 induction. The imbalance of her renown as a songwriter to her amazing voice and playing on her albums felt staggering. The performances reflected that too. Yes, all the songs that were performed were on Tapestry, but they were also all songs that her versions are not the big hits, best-known, or most revered. Heaven forbid that Taylor Swift kick things off with the energetic "I Feel The Earth Move," or that "So Far Away" find its way in there. Or "Nightingale" or "Jazzman" to remind us Carole King had so much amazing music after Tapestry. In the room itself, the only musical moment that felt distinctly about her solo career was when they played "I Feel The Earth Move" as Carole got up on stage to accept her induction. Obviously I don't know who decided on the setlist. Maybe it was Carole herself. But it really feels like the Hall inducting her as an artist was done in a very left-handed way, like they're saying, "Yeah okay, we'll acknowledge her as a recording artist... but really, naahhhhh." Still, I loved Carole's speech, and I'm really happy for her. Major injustice rectified, and kudos to Carole for gently but powerfully calling out the Hall for not giving a tribute to Aretha Franklin immediately. Maybe Jennifer Hudson's performance was selected to serve a dual purpose..
LL Cool J: My hypothesis is that the reason LL Cool J got so much real estate was as a mea culpa for not being able to get him in as a Performer, and to give the middle finger to all those who refused to vote for him. His set almost felt like watching a Superbowl halftime show, with the appearances of Eminem and Jennifer Lopez. It'll be interesting to see if Jennifer Lopez ever gets any love from the Hall.
Randy Rhoads: Good speech from Tom. The video package did a great job of showing his importance and influence. And I love that they got a clip of the man speaking. That makes it more meaningful, in my opinion. It's a shame they couldn't give any of his family a moment onstage to give a thank you speech. Also a shame he didn't get to work with more people or get his demos released.
Billy Preston: I know they had to keep it tight, but I wish this package was a little longer. I think Ringo did a good job with his speech, but I'm a bit of a stan for Ringo, so take that for what it's worth. I'm glad they showed how Billy did more than just the Let It Be sessions. Again, wish a living family member could have accepted for him and said a quick thank you. Just to show there are people there who care. If I'd been there, Billy is the male inductee I would have been cheering for the loudest.
Tina Turner: If it had been for anyone else, I'd have found Angela Bassett's delivery style overwrought. But this is Tina Turner. It fit perfectly. I'm glad the package featured Lizzo. If I could think of a current artist directly descended from Tina's solo career, it's Lizzo. Glad to see Cher too. I wanna see her as a double inductee, but so much time has passed, that getting Sonny And Cher in at all is a pipe dream at this point. Being the age I am and growing up when I did, one of the first things I learned about Tina, even before any of her songs, was for having/being "the best legs in the business." So, in a way, I'm glad that they had video footage showing how she got that accolade, but even more glad that nobody talked about it, because it must remain about the music. And unlike with Carole, you knew this was entirely about her solo career. Loved her simple yet heartfelt acceptance speech from her home. Gotta admit though, the performances didn't thrill me. They were good, but "It's Only Love" was one of the overplayed Adult Contemporary songs from my radio days, and "What's Love Got To Do With It" has never been among my favorite songs (but it's iconic, it's got to be there, and hey, H.E.R. and Mickey Guyton slayed their performances). Christina did a pretty good job with "River Deep - Mountain High," and I like how they were reclaiming that song back from her previous career. Still could've done without the flourishes at the end though.
Clarence Avant: Of the male inductees who were there, this is the one I would have been cheering for the loudest. I loved Lionel Richie's speech, too. Especially when he started by throwing some shade at the Wikipedia page for Clarence. If you read that page, you really don't get a sense of his importance at all. Having watched The Black Godfather, I just feel like he's someone I'd want to meet too. I want him to be made Postmaster General once DeJoy is gone. And of course, gotta love the wit and sincerity of Clarence's acceptance speech.
Todd Rundgren: Patti Smith was the perfect inductor for him. An artistic genius inducting another artistic genius. The video package was phenomenal, and I love how they closed it with his famous line against the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. Still, I would have loved it if he had shown up, just played the morbid and offbeat "Flappie," and then wordlessly walked offstage. That'd have been the best compromise we could have gotten for the fans while still giving the middle finger to the institution. But then again, Todd in the video package said why he doesn't like to compromise.
Charley Patton: Hey, you work with what you got. Almost no photographs of the man, no video footage, few people alive who ever met him (if any), little footage about his influence from those who were influenced by him. Gary Clark, Jr. did well. Although, living near the Nooksack River, the song "High Water Everywhere" hits a little too close to home right now. I'm okay though, but many are not right now. Just a sidebar if you're looking for people to pray for or send positive thoughts and energy to.
Kraftwerk: I loved the video footage of them performing. I knew they were known as the robots, but I didn't realize that it really permeated, like watching Shields And Yarnell, or Arte Johnston and Judy Carne on "Laugh-In," but serious. And seeing the instruments they played on and the engineering equipment they used brought it home further. And then add the way Kraftwerk records influenced hip-hop. Just a shame that they couldn't have been voted in the regular way.
The Go-Go's: I said it in the second paragraph of my "Dryer And The Rock Hall" post, but this is the group that should have headlined. I loved Drew Barrymore's enthusiasm in her speech and while watching the Go-Go's' performance. I loved the video package, but maybe ran a little long. Mainly because the women were actually there. I think that's a good rule of thumb to follow. If the inductee is there, and especially if performing, go with a shorter video package. But I liked the moment when Jane Wiedlin said, "Yeah, sisters that stabbed each other in the back." Just another example of sexism in the industry. Women in groups have to behave like some preconceived notion of what sisterhood means. No one asks that of the guy bands, do they, if they're really all brothers together? I mean, some say they're like family, but it's hokey to ask if they're like siblings. Loved the speeches, and their performance kicked ass. One subtle moment I caught was at the start of their second song, when Jane walked right up to her monitor/amp to check her sound in it while they were playing. That's a true musician's move. Anyone who wants to downplay their credibility, that's just a simple thing that was subtly done, but it speaks volumes of their professionalism and dedication to putting on an amazing show. And if they'd been the headliner, you can bet we'd have gotten to the actual all-star jam.
Gil Scott-Heron: Common did a smooth job with the speech, and the video package showed how Gil's recordings are still important and relevant, which is both amazing and disheartening. Overall, I'm frustrated that the NomComm never even tried putting Gil Scott-Heron on the ballot (but he was Previously Considered, so somebody tried), and also frustrated that he probably would have still needed the "category treatment" if they had. If they had to do it with a hip-hop pioneer and a pioneer that got sampled in hip-hop, they'd have to do it with a political and vocal delivery progenitor of hip-hop too. I'll be looking forward to Joe Tex and the Last Poets getting inducted as Early Influences in the next few years (eyeroll).
In Memoriam: Not much else to be said that hasn't already. "Bye Bye Love" would have been too on the nose for the tribute performance, and "On The Wings Of A Nightingale" was too minor and late of a hit in the Everly Brothers' catalog to have worked. "All I Have To Do Is Dream" was the right choice.
Jay-Z: After the message from Barack Obsma, we got the tribute performance: others reciting the Jay-Z lyrics that were meaningful to them or important overall. I admittedly have no consciousness of the news right now, little time for social media, so I was unaware of Dave Chappelle's current situation. I thought his speech was great. It felt genuine and was defensive against the appropriation of African-American culture by the Caucasian community at large. Solid video package, and wonderful speech from the man himself, though admittedly a little redundant. I guess the moment just moved him to say it again.
Foo Fighters: It's a mixed bag. The video package was better than Paul McCartney's speech. I honestly would have rather had P!nk do the honors. I know Joe Kwaczala said it should have been Jack Black, but honestly, I'd be happy to never see or hear that professional manchild ever again (Jack, not Joe). The video package really did justice to the other members of the band, and Paul's speech was the patent reminder that we absolutely had to induct the Foo Fighters because... Dave Grohl.
But I'll say this now: I'm glad that Foo Fighters have been inducted. This was something I wanted to write about for awhile, but this induction gives me an opportunity to say it hopefully succinctly. Foo Fighters are a good inductee due to their popularity as hitmakers (albeit on the Mainstream and Modern Rock charts and less so the Hot 100), without being innovative or hugely influential. The Hall Of Fame is about recognizing those, both musicians and not, who contributed to the perpetuation and evolution of rock and roll music. Get that? Not just evolution, but also perpetuation. And even then, when you recall your high school biology classes, evolution requires adaptation to stimuli, that occurs over a pace of multiple generations. In other words, evolution also requires proliferation. A species that reproduces sexually can't evolve without some good old-fashioned "sticking two together" as Outkast would say. In terms of a cultural evolution, something has to remain popular to evolve, whether it's rock and roll, movie franchises, fast food menus, or Mario video games. Economic principles come into play here, but then again, they kind of do when it comes to human evolution too. The '60s are revered as the golden decade of rock and roll for a few reasons, but one of those was simply because of how popular it was. People sometimes say rock is dead today because it's not the most popular part of the contemporary hits radio format, and rock radio stations aren't as ubiquitious as Top 40 stations. Remaining popular is a valid piece of rock and roll's evolution, and it's okay to recognize and enshrine Foo Fighters for it. Just as it would be equally valid to induct Paul Revere And The Raiders for their string of hit rock and roll singles, or even Motley Crue for their number of hits and renewed popularity. Those acts won't rank high on my "Merits Ranks" listings (unless the ballot is weak that year), but they will get a passing grade from me if we simply use a "Pass/Fail" litmus test that I believe we should be using, which could ostensibly help create bigger classes and help clear the backlog without having to resort to surreptitious shenanigans that undermine an instituion that by its very mission, whether they realize it or not, purports itself to be a historical society. Okay, that was longer than intended, but shorter than the whole entry that it could have been.
Wrapping up, it's clear the video packages from last year's televised special worked so well because it was pretty much the best we could do. Now that we can assemble again, we don't have to use them as a crutch. They work well in a pinch, and if an inductee is dead or otherwise can't or won't show up (even with a recorded thank-you speech), it's okay to rely on them and have them go a little longer. But if an inductee is there, let them do more of the talking. Maybe the people making the packages should try coordinating with the presenters and find out what they plan to say. That way, they can trim down the packages to prevent unnecessary redundancies. Some redundancy is okay, when it's done for emphasis, but trim the fat where you can.
And for crying out loud, do the freggin' all-star jam. Even if you have to start with it and move it in post to the very end.
Thursday, July 22, 2021
Songs Of Proof: The Class Of 2020
Depeche Mode: "Strangelove" ('88)
the Doobie Borthers: "Jesus Is Just Alright"
Whitney Houston: "I Wanna Dance With Somebody (Who Loves Me)"
Jon Landau: "Cover Me" by Bruce Springsteen
Nine Inch Nails: "The Perfect Drug"
the Notorious B.I.G.: "Big Poppa"
T. Rex: "Bang A Gong (Get It On)"
Tuesday, May 18, 2021
The Dryer And The Rock Hall
For some time, the dryer in the hosue where I live has been dying. The only heat cycle that worked was the low heat, and even then only sometimes. Then last Tuesday, I did a load of laundry, out of the washer by late morning and into the dryer. And there that load stayed until the next morning. The final heat cycle had crapped out. Despite telling my landlord about it, we couldn't get it taken care of that night, so I had to just keep running it on no heat. The drum still spun, and I guess air was still blowing inside it, but the laundry would just not dry properly. Said following morning, after nearly a full 24 hours in the dryer, I removed the load out of resignation. It was finally dry enough to fold and put away, and my landlord said no problem then! My clothes were dry, so I shouldn't be upset! But I was upset. I had another load to do that included towels and denim. I was upset that we weren't going to have a working dryer in the house to take care of the rest of my laundry. I was upset that what should have taken an hour took a day, and that he's going to flip out when he realizes that having to run the dryer so many times is going to wreak havoc on the electric bill this month. I was upset that I had to do laundry for months with a dryer that wasn't working the way it was supposed to, and now is completely broken. And I was getting upset that I was being told I shouldn't be upset about it because my clothes were finally dry. I should be happy my clothes were dry, and forget about the fact that the dang dryer is broken.
On a relatively unrelated note, the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame announced their Class Of 2021 last Wednesday, the same day that first load was finally dry. First off, a little bit of a cheer. At the most petty level, boo-yah. Six for six. My seventh pick was a 50-50, might-or-might-not-happen scenario, but the top six... nailed it. I feel pretty good about it, especially since I've had years where I only got two correct. This was a much-needed win for my confidence. Onto the inductees now, I'm absolutely stoked about Tina Turner and Carole King getting their second inductions. They are both so absolutely deserving of the honors. I currently am unable to access the old file I had of my list of 100 inductions I wanted to see, but I'm reasonably certain Carole King was on it. I know Tina wasn't, because when I wrote the list back in 2004, I didn't realize her first release as a soloist was in the 1970s. I thought her solo career hit the ground running with "What's Love Got To Do With It" and that she had a few more years to wait. Not much to say about Foo Fighters getting in. It's yet another reminder that the Hall's pecking order is not sorted chronologically, but we all know that already. Congratulations to Dave Grohl becoming the first living double first-year-eligible inductee. I'm extremely thrilled that the Go-Go's made it. Not just because of their contribution in the battle for representation in the Hall, but because they just have an awesome energy to their music, even if I don't glomp on every track. They really are a fantastic example of unquestionable musical excellence. This band could be the headliner, not just because they rock, but their music embraces positivity in such an upbeat and peppy way that would bring down the house: something that the distortion pedals of Foo Fighters, the braggadochio of Jay-Z, the sass of Tina Turner, the offbeat quirk of Todd Rundgren, and the comparatively mellow style of Carole King all don't have. Not that any of those acts wouldn't make great closers, but to be able to end the night with such cheerful and revelrous vibes would be epic. I'm officially casting my vote that no one will care about; I want the Go-Go's as the headliners. Of the six inductees, Todd Rundgren seems to be the one people are disappointed in. Maybe it's because they didn't predict him; maybe it's because they know he won't show up for the ceremony. Maybe it's because people wanted his work behind the scenes to be included in his induction in a little box with a bow and a tag that read "Award For Musical Excellence," but whatever the reason, watchers have been kind of grumbling about this one slightly. I say give his records another listen. And despite not having a huge string of hit singles, he had a good output of albums, and he genuinely deserves his induction as a Performer. Again, I can't be sure, but he might have been on that list of 100 I had. He might not have though. Lastly, congrats to Jay-Z on also getting in. I'm a little surprised that my "deferred induction" thought generated any conversation on Twitter, but it was cool to at least discuss. I will confess, I didn't really think it was going to happen, as evidenced by the fact I still predicted him to get in this year, but it was a fun little way to guess how the Hall was going to try to have it both ways. And really, was it so hard to imagine? Things seem like nonsense until the Rock Hall does them. Then they seem like nonsense BECAUSE the Rock Hall does them.
Which brings us to the other categories. Well, maybe not the Ahmet Ertegun Award category, other than the fact that it's still named after a notorious womanizer. But there is certainly no controversy around the induction of Clarence Avant in this category. As far as anyone can tell, there's no insider baseball kind of cronyism surrounding this induction. Although I now wonder if maybe someone attached to the Hall is involved with the documentary. Maybe it's best not to peek under that rock and just enjoy this induction as worthy of happening. And absolutely no static from anyone about Charley Patton receiving an Early Influence induction. This is the kind of education that the Hall does when it's doing its job right. I plan to spend some time listening to his catalog soon and getting a feel for his importance. Randy Rhoads is going to receive an Award For Musical Excellence induction, and that makes sense. An incredible heavy metal guitarist who probably wouldn't be included in the Quiet Riot induction that is never going to happen anyway. But his contributions to metal cannot be ignored, and thankfully, they won't be. Getting a little muddier, I have mixed feelings about Billy Preston being given the Award For Musical Excellence induction. True, he was a very important session musician, but he also had a substantial recording career, and the Hall has inducted Performer inductees that weren't as successful as Preston, and arguably not as influential either. Still, I can respect the argument that his session work was more important. Besides which, this harkens back to when they first renamed the Sideman category to Award For Musical Excellence to honor Leon Russell, another session man with a career as a featured artist that was worth at least peeking into. So.... okay. And I know for certain that Billy Preston was on that list of 100, so I get another year added onto the streak, that the Zombies and Doobie Brothers kept alive the past two years.
But of course, it's the other three that are causing the arching of eyebrows. I won't rehash the entirety of what I've said on Twitter, but inducting Gil Scott-Heron and Kraftwerk in the Early Influence category when there were a few nominees for the Performer category who predate them is, to put it mildly. inconsistent. And of course the Hall went ahead and redefined the parameters of the category. And for all those who wanted the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame to have a Veterans Committee category, congratulations, you got it. It's called "Early Influence," because the Hall had to take a simple task and find a way to screw it up. I'm personally disgruntled because rock and roll is a style of music to me. It is a style of music that is the product of a multitude of sources, and is constatnly evolving and incorporating other influences to keep making wonderful and varied subgenres, but it is still a style of music. With their redefinition of the category, the Hall has pretty much conceded the definition of "rock and roll" as "the music of youth culture." To be completely fair, I have gone on record to talk about how youth culture was a catalyst for the rise and domination of rock and roll. But I also have opined at great length about how history has benchmarks that are immutable. This is not something that I can lay entirely at the feet of John Sykes, as the idea has been getting batted about for some time now. But this is very much in keeping with John Sykes' promise to move the Hall forward to reach the younger generations. I'm certainly all for that, but as I've stated before, it's hard for a pop cultural institution to reach a generation that is younger than the career of even the most newly eligible candidate for said institution. That's not denying there are teenagers interested in music made before they were born (that was me, after all), but it's not the norm. So unless the Rock Hall is officially changing the dictionary to define "youth culture" to mean "parents who aren't yet strenuously recommended to get annual mammograms or prostate exams," maybe they need to try a different approach. In any event, calling something pre-rock when it isn't is wrong and calling something "pre-movement" or "pre-moment" is just.... ew.
And if that makes you feel icky, arguably worse than that is the induction of LL Cool J in the Award For Musical Excellence category. As I stated above, this category was the phoenix that rose from the ashes of the murdered-young Sideman category. Unlike most of the other inductees in this category, there's really nothing about LL's career in rap that wasn't Performer. What's galling about this though, is I have a strong suspicion how the Hall is going to frame the video package. Last year, the induction package for Jon Landau tried to frame him primarily as a producer, a critic second, and a manager third; while the truth is any real credentials beyond being on the Nominating Committee is from being Springsteen's maanger first and far away, and producer and critic so far behind that it doesn't matter which one ranks second and which third. Same with Ringo Starr, whose video package dwelt heavily on how he revolutionized rock and roll drumming. So with LL Cool J, look for the video package to focus on two things: one, the importance of Def Jam records, and thereby LL Cool J; two, his overall celebrity and how it elevates rap and the African-American community at large. Well, a Rock Hall induction isn't an NAACP Award, and the Rock Hall certainly doesn't have enough moral footing to extol the latter predicted focus. And the entirety of his importance to Def Jam records was as a recording artist.
So why care? As has been said, in six months, when someone asks, "Is Kraftwerk in the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame?", we'll be able to say, "Yes." Well, you'll be able to say, "Yes." I'll be sucking in air through my teeth and exhaling, "Technicallllyyyyyyyyy...." It's like the dryer. Is my laundry dry? Perhaps, but I still have the right to be mad that it took 12-16 hours of the drum turning to get it dry; that my situation is such that as long as one heating cycle is operating, my landlord is going to ignore all advisory that the darn thing is on its last leg; that at one point the plan was to transplant the plug off the old dryer and put it on the upstairs dryer so that it could run downstairs (which apparently is a thing, but just sounds sketchy and unsafe). At the end of the day, I'm upset that I'm having to deal with that which is broken. It shouldn't be this hard to get a load of laundry done at home. It shouldn't be this hard to induct LL Cool J into the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame as an artist of the rock and roll era whose music is part of the rock and roll diaspora. Same with Kraftwerk. Same with Chaka Khan, Devo, Queen Latifah, Iron Maiden, Wanda Jackson, Judas Priest, Fela Kuti, Jethro Tull, Lesley Gore, Tina Turner, Eurythmics, Soundgarden, Barry White, the Stylistics, Chubby Checker, the Shangri-La's, the Marvelettes, and a myriad of other artists. (And yes, the inclusion of Tina Turner was intentional, because when the discussion of Tina as a solo artist was mentioned on the "Who Cares About The Rock Hall?" podcast, the response of the three guests was surprising, to say the least.) It's upsetting that the system is broken and the solution in place is patchwork and jury-rigging. We want to be able to respect the process as well as the institution. I said on Twitter that it must be true that fans always care more about canon than the institutions themselves, and that has proven true again (proof: futurerocklegends.com is a better resource for Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame information than the official website of the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame). Part of the reason we didn't care as much before is the information wasn't as readily available as it is now.
The Rock Hall did a great job with the Performer category this year, and though it would have been great to have more, these six by themselves ain't bad. And to be fair, the majority of the inductees in the other categories are either spot on or reasonable. And getting Early Influence or Award For Musical Excellence is a hell of a lot better than getting pigeonholed for one song in the Singles Category. But I'm apprehensive about what it means down the road. Calling Kraftwerk and Gil Scott-Heron "Early Influences" is explicitly calling them "Not rock and roll." Same with putting LL Cool J in the AME category. It's saying what he brought to the table was important to rock and roll, and maybe a part of rock and roll culture, but it's not rock and roll music. This is how the rockists win. This is how the Performer category eventually kowtows to the narrow-minded who believe if it ain't an all-white, all-male guitar band, it ain't rock and roll. This is how the Hall caters to those who will never (and maybe can never) visit the museum, and even if they do, they'll only go to the exhibits about their favorite bands because they have absoltuely no interest in the educational aspects of the institution, only that the music that fuels their BDE (or SPR more accurately) is validated. And as far as I'm concerned, this is how the Hall codifies the stratification of artists of color or any gender other than male that should be Performers, but get told, "Well, not quite." I don't like how asserting that LL's AME nod is not a consolation prize has eerie echoes of things I'm not even comfortable saying on this blog. The Hall has never really acted with integrity, but if it really can do whatever it wants, what does it say that it wants to do it this way?
But can the Hall? The longer this goes on, the more I see what I believe are the limits of the Foundation's power. In the past, I've said that if induction by fiat really was a thing, Chic would be in. But now, we know what induction by fiat really looks like. It would appear the Hall is accountable to other interests when it comes to the main draw: the Performer category. This in no way is meant as a mea culpa for the above paragraph either, make no mistake. The Rock Hall should be able, and maybe used to be able, to tell exhibition outlets like HBO, "Here's what we're doing. Work around it." It would appear that now, in an age where audio exhibition is dominated less by purchases than it is by ad revenue on streaming services, and where artists can no longer make it on album sales but have to have either a hugely successful tour and line of merchandise or endorsement deals to sustain themselves, the Hall has to rely on the HBO presentation of the ceremony as its major fundraiser (and the event itself), which gives HBO the leverage to call the shots. And it appears they are trying to format the event like a television show, apparently right down to how much airtime an act is worth. It seems like a living Performer inductee is worth as many minutes of airtime as two AME inductees and a Non-Performer. I mean, maybe LL Cool J really did finish that low in the vote totals, but the Hall's lack of transparency would have been the perfect cover for calling him a seventh Performer inductee. No one would have known, and only those most upset about Iron Maiden missing out would have been upset at having two rapper Performer inductees. Maybe the Hall really respects their voting process that much, it just seems like the less likely reason for this. Future Rock Legends suggested giving the Nominating Committee their automatic inductee, (which I also suggested once, but in all fairness, my suggestion of it was a few sentences buried in a long paragraph in an extremely long post), and at this point, I'd welcome that. HBO probably wouldn't approve, but no one would have to tell them that's what the Hall's doing either.
The sad reality is, as long as television formatting for the ceremony dictates how the classes are shaped, we're never going to get bigger classes with more Performer inductees. The only way to make that happen within some semblance of those parameters... is to do away with individual performances. Bring it back to the old days where all the speeches and video packages are done, and have some instruments onstage aftwerards, and then whoever wants to jam together can make some musical magic together in a frenzied free-for-all of rock and roll energy. You can edit the speeches down all you want, and limit who talks for how long, but the musical performances are where the time is going to be eaten up, between setting up, performing, and striking to transition. More inductees will necessitate fewer performances, which nobody wants. Even I don't want it, though growing up without MTV or any opportunity to see concerts--where if it wasn't played on commercial radio, it didn't exist--would at least make me more able to adjust to it. There's also talk of multiple ceremonies, the logistics of which would be a mess, and other hybrid suggestions of these things. I hope we can find a way to once again have nine or ten Performer inductees a year. There is no perfect system because what the fans want and what it takes to make these things happen are seemingly at odds against the backdrop of the crony capitalistic dystopia that envelops the millennial lives and awaits to haunt the younger generations. Such things are beyond the power of the Hall's powers-that-be.
However, these side categories are completely under the control of the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. That's why there are so many inductees in them this year, because their inductions will presumably take less time, and so the Hall can operate independently in deciding these categories. And this is where the failure truly does belong to the powers-that-be in the Foundation. As both the "Who Cares About The Rock Hall?" and the "Hall Watchers" podcasts pointed out, as have multiple blog posts, there are literally no women in any of these other categories. Not one. This is the third year where there have been more inductees outside of the Performer category than in it (2000 and 2010 being the other years), and for all of that, they couldn't induct any women. The only three women in Non-Performer category are songwriters who were inducted with their historic songwriting and marriage partners. The only woman inducted in the Award For Musical Excellence category is a member of a large backing band that but for her is all men. The Hall's extensive use of these categories this year suggests a unilateral control over inductions into these categories. This is where we really can say that if they wanted to do it, they would. And they didn't. We still don't have Estelle Axton. We still don't have Ella Fitzgerald. We still don't have Carol Kaye. We still don't have the Three Degrees. We don't have all these women who should be in already. The Hall just didn't do them, but instead chose to reword the categories' parameters. If putting in LL Cool J in the Award For Musical Excellence category, thereby getting him off the ballot, is what it takes to finally get Salt-n-Pepa on the ballot, then at least some good will have come out of it. But I have a pesky feeling that unless some personnel changes are made on these subcommittees, it's not gonna happen. Last year's inductions of Irving Azoff and Jon Landau served as a reminder that the Hall, despite all the good it has done over the years, was originally an institution for the people in the room, where selections were made by the people in the room, to celebrate the people in the room for being the people in the room. This year is a softening of that stance. And maybe they meant it as a middle finger to HBO saying, "Only six Performers, well fine, but we're doing SEVEN in the other categories!" But it still also serves as an enforcement of the patriarchy of the institution. The Hall needs to induct more women, they need more women on the NomComm and in the voting body, and we men all need to listen to women more. Last year, on "Who Cares About The Rock Hall?", when Evelyn McDonnell discussed her ballot, she mentioned how she felt torn because there were male acts she wanted to vote for, but felt it would be a betrayal of her cause if she did. It shouldn't be like that. We need to get to where a nomination and vote for Duran Duran (an all-male band whose nomination and induction I've seen advocated for by women on Twitter) won't be seen as betrayal, but rather the result of listening to women. I'm guilty of it too, and spectacularly so (rereading things I'd previously written make me cringe at the carelessness of wording, for starters), but I'm trying to get better. We can't give up though. There was another analogy involoving chicken nuggets to make, but Kristen Studard said it right, where maybe we should just have a ballot without white men. Amen. And awomen to that, too.
Nelson Mandela said the wheels of government grind slowly, and that really applies to bureaucracy of any kind. Maybe we're mad because the change isn't coming as immediate as our Amazon Prime packages. Those of us who are upset are definitely upset because it didn't happen the way we feel it should have in a more utopian environment. But there were some good surprises too. This is an overall good class, and it's important to remember than of the thirteen inductees, nine or ten of them most of us have little quarrel with. Progress was made, and it's important to treat that progress as a beginning rather than laurels to rest on. Maybe we'll even learn to be more gentle and encouraging to the Hall. Anything is possible. This has been a good start, and we'll move on up a little higher next season. But for now, I'm going to go bang the drum all day, forget about the ninety-nine problems, and the monkey wrench the Hall is using to try and fix them. Maybe I'll go see a private dancer, because apparently, it's too late for me to do any better with my social life. Or maybe I just need a vacation.
And in case you're wondering, I got my other load of laundry done, thanks to friends from church who showed me grace. Still don't have a dryer yet, so we'll see what happens this week.
Monday, May 10, 2021
Prediction for the Class Of 2021
Coming now to the main event, predicting who will be inducted. We've examined the merits, as well as the pleasure, and now it's time to predict who makes the cut. As many have said, it's a great ballot, and a shame that we have turn away the majority of them. As a community, we have been saying it's almost impossible to have a bad class from this batch. Honestly, that makes me reel a little, because we said the same thing about the ballot for the Class Of 2016. We got a good class, but one that was a little too homogeneous, and a little socially tone deaf, to be honest. The Hall almost made it mathetmatically impossible to duplicate that level of letdown, but as Eddie Trunk demonstrated when he filled out his ballot, it is still possible. The fun thing about the predictions is that I can now work in the politics of the Hall, because that deals more with the "will" as opposed to the "should" of it all. So it is with that sense of optimistic trepidation, I proceed to predict the inductees for the Class Of 2021 for the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame.
1. TINA TURNER
Rock and roll singer, previously inducted in the duo Ike And Tina Turner. First-time nominee as a solo artist.
Why she might make it: She has an amazing legacy as a singer and an all-around entertainer. Her comeback as a soloist in the 1980s made the world forget she had been in a duo, and she is well-connected in the industry.
Why she might not: Her "imperial reign" as a solo singer was not terribly long, and the music from that time, except for a few songs, hasn't aged the greatest. Some even say that her most important work was in the duo, not in the '80s.
Whom she'd pave the way for: Though stylistically different, an induction for Tina could indicate possibilities for someone like Tracy Chapman. It will hopefully also get the Hall to look at more women who would make great dual inductees, like Diana Ross.
Biggest threats: Carole King is the other woman vying for a second induction after being inducted with her ex-husband in the early '90s. Chaka Khan and Mary J. Blige could also steal away some votes from her, as could Dionne Warwick.
In the end: Between the documentary, the ceiling shattered by Stevie Nicks, the outcry for representation, and her connections in the industry (even in the Hall, she was at those early ceremonies, folks), it's happening. A storybook coda, but maybe not quite epilogue for this legend. Odds of induction: 95%
2. CAROLE KING
Iconic singer/songwriter, previously inducted as a Non-Performer for the songwriting duo of Gerry Goffin & Carole King. Second nomination as a solo artist; her first nomination was befoore I'd even heard of the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame, so of course she's previously unseeded.
Why she might make it: She is a legend, with just about every presitgious honor the music industry could bestow upon her. Her songwriting skill is legendary, and her songs have stood the test of time.
Why she might not: Some don't think her landmark album Tapestry is enough, and that album is the sum total of her credentials, despite how many other hit albums and songs she's had. Additionally, there are those who still feel that dual inductions are redundant and overkill, despite the two dozen such occurrences there already are. Plus, the Hall has a bad habit of digging its heels at times and doubling down when it shouldn't.
Whom she'd pave the way for: A revisit to '70s singer/songwriters could probably get the Hall to finally nominate Carly Simon or Jim Croce, maybe even Don McLean or Anne Murray. A little outside-the-box thinking could also show that Dolly Parton could follow behind her. Even further away from the box, maybe inducting Carole in a second category could get another nomination for King Curtis, but this time include His Noble Knights in the nomination.
Biggest threats: Tina Turner is the other woman vying for a second induction after being inducted with her ex-husband in the early '90s. The Go-Go's are also well-reputed for writing their own music, and Dionne Warwick is another Oldies artist that could be enshrined this year. And don't overlook Kate Bush or Todd Rundgren as competent singer/songwriters as well.
In the end: In my opinion, Carole King should have been the first woman inducted twice into the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame and the first person inducted in two categories (and Ringo should have been inducted as a Performer, but I've tilted at that windmill enough for now), and they both should have happened before Y2K. If Tapestry is enough to get the producer of that album inducted--and sure he's done other stuff, but his induction package focused on that outing--then it is damn well sufficient to induct the artist who wrote and recorded it--and she had several more commercially respectably successful albums besides. And it's gonna happen. Odds of induction: 90%
3. THE GO-GO'S
All-female rock and roll band. First-time nominee
Why they might make it: They've been gaining momentum over the past couple years as the muscle of Rolling Stone has atrophied. Their achievement of the first all-female rock band to have a #1 album is a massive accomplishment, and they are a trailblazing band, both in terms of breaking the glasss ceiling and in bringing post-punk sensibilities to the mainstream.
Why they might not: Because the height of their popularity was short-lived, they might be seen as not having done enough. Plus, the old guard at the Hall still have a mild distaste for the decade of the '80s, to say nothing of the fact they don't get along with those still cozy with Jann S. Wenner.
Whom they'd pave the way for: All-girl bands like Bikini Kill or the Bangles might be next in the queue. You could also look to post-punk acts like Sonic Youth or X.
Biggest threats: Sonically, Devo is the most similar to them and could nab a few votes that might otherwise go to the Go-Go's. The New York Dolls are a punk act that could detract from a punkish sounding post-punk band. Tina Turner is another solid figure of the '80s, and Carole King has a pretty strong reputation for the creation of her own music.
In the end: The Go-Go's are one of the bands the Hall needs the most, especially in the context of what John Sykes says his vision for the future of the Hall looks like. I think there will be enough voters who concur with that sentiment. Odds of induction: 75%
4. FOO FIGHTERS
Hard-rock band. Newly eligible, and thus first-time nominee.
Why they might make it: They're a hard rock band in the tradition of post-British Invasion rock. Additionally, who doesn't love Dave Grohl?
Why they might not: Their candidacy is reminiscent of Green Day's back in 2015: a newly eligible solid rock band with steady output, hit songs, acclaim, and that has a good relationship with the Hall... but aren't really the most deserving act on the ballot. They're seen as having helped with the continued perpetuation of rock and roll, but not so much in helping the evolution of the art.
Whom they'd pave the way for: Most of the acts they'd open the door for aren't eligible yet: big name rock bands like the White Stripes, Franz Ferdinand, and Queens Of The Stone Age.
Biggest threats: Rage Against The Machine is another '90s rock act with a member on the Hall's Nominating Committee. Iron Maiden is another strong name for harder rock.
In the end: It's who you know and who knows you. The Hall will likely have three new members of the Clyde McPhatter club this year. Still, it's not as strong a lock with these guys. Odds of induction: 60%
5. TODD RUNDGREN
Musical utility-player and producer extraordinaire. Second-time nominee, seeded #3 for 2019 and #13 for 2020.
Why he might make it: Todd is well-connected in the industry, with strong ties that reach pretty far. He sings, plays instruments, writes, produces, and even innovates listening opportunities.
Why he might not: The Hall loves those who love them, and Todd does not love them. Additionally, those who want the Hall to rectify the backlog want the Hall to induct Todd either as a Non-Performer for his production wizardry, or Award For Music Excellence as an umbrella for his production, musicianship, side projects, and all-around innovation--mostly just to get his name off the ballot. By not voting for him, those voters are trying to force the Hall's hand on the matter.
Whom he'd pave the way for: He doesn't open up too many tributaries, but maybe others that are well-loved within the industry have a shot, like Big Star, or a second nomination for John Prine down the line.
Biggest threats: Carole King is the bigger name for singer/songwriters. Kate Bush and Devo are also well-known for sonic experimentation.
In the end: Based on what was said about Judas Priest's past nominations, it can be extrapolated that Rundgren's third consecutive nomination is because each time he's come close. Third time should be the charm. Odds of induction: 55%
6. JAY-Z
Rapper, producer, all-around entrepreneur. Newly eligible, first-time nominee.
Why he might make it: Quite possibly the biggest name in the entertainment industry over the past twenty-five years not named Beyonce. He is influential, creative, makes amazing music, and just carries an all-around cache to his name. In short, too big to ignore.
Why he might not: There are actually a few reasons. His business and brand can be interpreted to symbolize the death of a music industry where musicians didn't have to have side hustles and endorsement deals to make a living, and the Hall might be resentful of that. The ceremony's in Cleveland, and the Hall's schedule before the global pandemic was almost certainly tailored to induct Jay-Z in his hometown of New York City on his first year of eligibility. Now that that's out the window, they may wish to induct him in the Big Apple rather than on his first year of eligibility. Lastly, his "Hova" persona presents as being as detached and uncaring as the real Jehovah was thought to be by the Israelites while they wandered in the desert. The Rock Hall is an institution that wants inductees who play ball with them. Even when he has played ball, the result was one of the standards of bad induction speeches, until the 2016 induction of Steve Miller, at least.
Whom he'd pave the way for: Eminem is newly eligible next year and was considered a gimme at one point. It'll be interesting if the Hall goes back for the solo careers of rappers like Chuck D, Dr. Dre, or Ice Cube as well.
Biggest threats: LL Cool J is another rapper on the ballot, and Mary J. Blige occupies a lot of the same space as Jay-Z, too. Foo Fighters are the other newly eligible act, and Todd Rundgren is a musician and production wizard too.
In the end: Okay, this is where it gets convoluted. Whether or not Jay-Z gets inducted this year, in my opinion, will depend on whether we can realistically expect herd immunity by the time of the ceremony. The Hall won't want to do an event that isn't packed due to social distancing requirements. They'd rather do another documentary induction like they did for 2020. And the Hall has made it clear that the next live induction ceremony is going to be in Cleveland, regardless of how long it takes for that to happen. But if they are able to have a live, packed ceremony in Cleveland this year, I think they will do something extremely unusual: they will announce Jay-Z as a top finisher, but will defer his induction to 2022 (possibly at his request), so they can do what they planned to all along, while also avoiding the backlash that not inducting Jay-Z immediately would otherwise likely have. In other words, that's how they'll have their cake and eat it too. However, if they cannot do a live ceremony, and have to do the documentary induction again, I think they'll just induct him this year, because they won't want to defer his induction more than one year. The question is, taking into account all the work crews involved in making it happen, having a general admission section, and even having a week or so in Cleveland to hype up the event, thus having to figure in herd immunity in the state of Ohio--does the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame believe enough people will be vaccinated to have a safe, profitable event in Cleveland this year? I think they'll err on the side of caution once more, do another documentary, and act so as not to have to worry about whether the Carters would deign to make appearances in Cavalier country. Which means he'll be enshrined this year. Odds of induction: 52%
7. DIONNE WARWICK
Female pop singer with a decades-spanning career. First-time nominee.
Why she might make it: She has a lengthy career, has worked with a lot of big names, and is having a huge resurgence in popularity due to Twitter. The Hall does like to strike while the iron is hot.
Why she might not: Most of her big hits were either hits on the Adult Contemporary charts, or could have been. Songs she made popular could have fit very comfortably on The Lawrence Welk Show back in the '60s, which is to say some have trouble considering her all that "rock and roll." For crying out loud, even Perry Como covered "That's What Friends Are For."
Whom she'd pave the way for: An induction for Warwick would probably lead to the induction of the songwriting duo of Burt Bacharach & Hal David in the Non-Performer category. Stylistically, she could help Roberta Flack or Sade get some notice. Because of her collaboration, she could help the Spinners get nominated again, or maybe get nominations for other women of the earlier years, like Connie Francis.
Biggest threats: Carole King's singer/songwriter catalog has a very soothing style not unlike Dionne's, making her direct competition. Chaka Khan is also close, in terms of space occupied.
In the end: It'll depend on how close the voting tallies go. Between first nominations being the best chance in general, and the internet being a fickle culture that can't guarantee she'll still be the Queen Of Twitter next year, this is maybe her only real shot. If there's a live event, you can bet Stevie, Elton, and Gladys would all show up to sing "That's What Friends Are For" onstage with her, as one of those moments that only the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame can make happen. Will it? Even if there isn't a live event, they may want to just usher her in. It's a split decision. Odds of induction: 50%
8. LL COOL J
One of hip-hop's first solo superstars. Sixth nomination, seeded #8 in 2010 and 2011 each, #4 for 2014, #13 for 2018, and #8 again for 2019.
Why he might make it: He's a legend in rap music, paved the way for other rappers to make it big, while making it big himself. He was the original mold for the male braggadochio show that rap was and still is, for better or worse.
Why he might not: He just can't seem to clear the bar. Rappers he helped make possible are in the Hall now and he's not. It's like he passed the torch and got left out in the cold as a result.
Whom he'd pave the way for: He could help clear the path for others like Ice-T and Snoop Doggy Dogg at some point.
Biggest threats: Jay-Z is the clear and present competitor. Mary J. Blige could also steal away a lot of votes from him too.
In the end: Remember that scenario I posited earlier with Jay-Z? If there is a live ceremony this year, and they defer Jay-Z's induction until 2022, the Hall won't want to keep falling behind on inducting rappers. That's really the only way I see LL Cool J making it this year: at a live ceremony in Cleveland. They could represent hip-hop with Blige as well, but LL has been waiting longer and has been let down harder more often. But I'm betting he'll be let down again when they do another documetnary and let Jay-Z in this time, and not him. Hard to say though. Odds of induction: 48%
9. DEVO
Post-punk, art-rock band from Ohio. Second nomination, seeded dead last at #15 for 2019.
Why they might make it: The Hall loves to reward artistic creativity, and these guys had it. Addtionally, if they can pull off a live ceremony in Cleveland this year, they'll want native Buckeye Staters there to make it more meaningful.
Why they might not: They might be a little too far out there for some, and a one-trick pony to others.
Whom they'd pave the way for: They might pave the way for an avant-garde act like They Might Be Giants to get inducted. Their music is fun at parties too, so maybe acts like the B-52's or Violent Femmes.
Biggest threats: The Go-Go's are the most sonically similar to Devo. Kate Bush is also uniquely artistic, as is Todd Rundgren.
In the end: Like LL Cool J, a live ceremony in Cleveland is the only scenario in which Devo gets in this year. And I'm thinking nope. Odds of induction: 45%
10. IRON MAIDEN
Heavy metal band most popular during the 1970s and '80s. First-time nominee.
Why they might make it: Heavy metal is a genre that many feel is in sore need of greater presence in the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame, and voters might rally to them. And who doesn't want to see Eddie on the stage, right?
Why they might not: The Hall just can't seem to stop doing metal dirty. Two misses for Judas Priest, one for Motorhead, eight nominations for Black Sabbath before getting them in, and Iron Maiden only now nominated. Metallica's waltzing right in is about the only real moment of ease for metal getting in. Also, they're a band you've heard of, but most probably can't name more than a couple songs they did.
Whom they'd pave the way for: The field of metal is pretty open. An induction for Iron Maiden could ramp up momentum for Judas Priest again, or maybe open the door for Pantera or Megadeth, just to name two of the more obvoius examples.
Biggest threats: Rage Against The Machine is the most metal of the other nominees. Foo Fighters are hard rock, and the New York Dolls are driving punk. All can make competition for this band.
In the end: It's weird to see me seed them this low. My prevailing theory was previously, "If you want to assure that a white rock band gets in, make them the only white rock band on the ballot." Iron Maiden is not the only such act on the ballot, but there are few enough of them that the rockist contingent will have no trouble coalescing in unity behind the same five acts, for the most part. That could spell trouble for those who are expecting this class to embrace the idea of representation mattering. Despite haunting echoes of the ballot for the Class Of 2016, the promise of thinking and moving forward from John Syke,s and the apparent listening by the Nominating Committee to the outcry from those of us who've been calling for wider representation in the Hall both have me thinking in won't be a repeat of 2016, and that metal will indeed be done dirty again. We'll see though. Odds of induction: 40%
11. CHAKA KHAN
R&B songstress, former lead singer of Rufus. Third nomination as a solo artist. Seeded #11 for 2016 and #17 for 2018.
Why she might make it: She has a long career as a singer with many strong ties in the music industry. Additionally, her preseence on The Masked Singer has sparked a strong amount of support for her.
Why she might not: Her solo career might be a little too easy listening for some voters, and those who think a person should only be inducted once are more likely to withhold support in favor of voting in Rufus the next time they are nominated. Still others just want her to be inducted in the Award For Musical Excellence category as a catchall for everything Chaka and call it done.
Whom she'd pave the way for: She could help get more of the classic disco acts recognized, ranging from Gloria Gaynor to KC And The Sunshine Band, and she could also clear the path for Mariah Carey or Celine Dion.
Biggest threats: Dionne Warwick is the most similar to Chaka in terms of sound, and Mary J. Blige owes a lot to Chaka but could steal votes from her. As could Tina Turner.
In the end: I genuinely hate the idea of giving Chaka Khan an Award For Musical Excellence induction. Doing so would result in the same empty, hollow feeling that introducing the Singles category did in 2018. And it will only make people angrier that it happened that way as time goes on. I hope she gets inducted twice. I would be thrilled if the first one happened this year, but I do not expect it. Odds of induction: 35%
12. MARY J. BLIGE
Pioneer of hip-hop/soul. First-time nominee.
Why she might make it: Of all the nominees on this year's ballot, she might be the paragon of the promise of a forward-thinking Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. She was pretty much unexpected, represents a style of music that is largely, if not completely, unrepresented in the Hall, and was just an overall breath of fresh air when her name was announced as being on the ballot.
Why she might not: The conglomeration of radio, the rise of autotune, and the domination of more electronophonic music may make hip-hop/soul look more like a fad than a part of the evolution of music.
Whom she'd pave the way for: An induction for Blige would open the way for artists like Brandy, Ashanti, Aaliyah, Toni Braxton, and maybe even blow up the dam holding back female rap acts like Queen Latifah, MC Lyte, and Salt-n-Pepa, just to name a few.
Biggest threats: Those who prefer a chronological approach to the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame may insist that Chaka Khan must go in before Mary J. Blige. Rappers LL Cool J and Jay-Z could probably keep votes out of her column too.
In the end: Between Tina Turner, Carole King, and the Go-Go's, and the story arcs that each of their inductions would be among the apices for, Mary J. Blige will simply get lost of the shuffle, because we need to make sure Foo Fighters and Jay-Z get in too. Odds of induction: 33.3%
13. RAGE AGAINST THE MACINE
Politically charged nu metal band. Seeded #8 for 2018 and #11 for 2019
Why they might make it: The insider nature of the Hall bodes very well for this band, with guitarist Tom Morello being on the Nominating Committee. Additionally, the Hall loves politically charged music, and they were that. They were also innovative in their sound.
Why they might not: They are a band you know the name of, and may even relate to the ethos of the name itself, but you might not know any of their actual songs.
Whom they'd pave the way for: With Morello's love of metal, bands like Slayer and Pantera could be reached back for and nominated.
Biggest threats: Foo Fighters are another hard rock band with a Nominating Committe member as a band member. It also wouldn't surprise me to learn that Tom Morello pitched Iron Maiden before biting into the giant hoagie and that even he expects them to draw votes away from his band.
In the end: I think the band members themselves would be glad to miss out on induction again if it was because the machine that is the Hall was being reprogrammed to have better and wider representation. Either way, though, they're missing out again. Odds of induction: 30%
14. FELA KUTI
Afrobeat pioneer. First-time nominee.
Why he might make it: One thing that a nomination for the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame will do, and that the Hall does right in this regard, is bring greater awareness to great artists that the general populace is unfamiliar with. The curiosity of the name has sparked curiosity of the music, and the interest has been sparked in many.
Why he might not: Aaaanndd there have been many others who have dug in their heels, doubled down on the willful ignorance, insisting being big in the U.S. is the bar to clear. What percentage of those people are in the voting bloc may be higher than we wish to acknowledge.
Whom he'd pave the way for: A whole continent of musical greatness awaits. The most likely would probably be Yassou N'Dour, who has worked with a few names well-known to the English-speaking world, like Peter Gabriel. King Sunny Ade and Sun Ra could get some recognition as well.
Biggest threats: His own obscurity in the United States. For the sake of what this heading is supposed to mean, let's say Mary J. Blige's hip-hop/soul is a funky enough style to draw votes away from Kuti.
In the end: As Joe Kwaczala said, even Award For Musical Excellence seems to be a bad fit for Kuti. They may have to create an International category to induct him. I hate this idea because it would only empower those with a closed-minded definition of rock and roll, who are probably closed-minded in other regards. But as long as the tail wags the dog, and the Hall keeps the classes unreasonably small, he's probably not getting in as a Performer. But the chatter his nomination has created at least keeps him from being seeded last this time. Odds of induction: 25%
15. THE NEW YORK DOLLS
Early punk-rock band. Second nomination, previously unseeded.
Why they might make it: They were a highly innovative and influential, both in terms of their music and their image, and the critics loved them.
Why they might not: Outside a few of the big names, punk rock really isn't having an easy time getting into the Hall. Additionally, they really never had major commercial success, and their circle of influence attentuates sharply the further you get from New York City.
Whom they'd pave the way for: Maybe getting them in first will help get the MC5 in? Beyond that, we could start looking at bands like the Dead Kennedys or Black Flag.
Biggest threats: Iron Maiden and Todd Rundgren are the only other acts that could really fit in the "classic rock" box with any level of comfort and are thus the most direct. Foo Fighters and Rage Against The Machine are also hard-edged bands. And oh yeah, don't forget the clear punk influences in the Go-Go's' music.
In the end: Like Carole King, the New York Dolls are returning to the ballot after a long absence. Unlike Carole King, there hasn't been nearly the amount of outrage over their omission, nor have they raked in the number of accolades she has to bolster their case. Odds of induction: 20%
16. KATE BUSH
Experimental Britih musician. Second nomination, seeded #17 (but not dead last) for 2018.
Why she might make it: The Hall loves the artistic, experimental musicians, and Kate is most definitely that and thensome. Additionally, the inductions of Roxy Music and T. Rex show that the Americentric bias in the ranks of the voting bloc is starting to erode and crumble. Lastly, remembering how the tail wags the dog with the Hall, if an induction documentary is how business will be handled again this year, this is the optimal chance to induct her and possibly get her to appear (for want of a better word) for her induction, via a pre-recorded acceptance from wherever she feels comfortable giving it.
Why she might not: There's still a strong Americentric presence in the Hall, and artists who work on their own timeline with no deadlines have trouble staying in the spotlight. Not that she coveted it, but we're discussing what helps and what hurts getting into the Hall.
Whom she'd pave the way for: Tori Amos is the most direct descendant of Kate Bush, stylistically, and thus would benefit the most. Bjork is another artist in that vein who could get some consideration.
Biggest threats: Carole King is the singer/songwriter most directly in her way, followed by the Go-Go's. For experimental, you've got Todd Rundgren, Devo, and even Mary J. Blige to contend with. And when it comes to the gift of metaphors in the lyrics, Fela Kuti is no slouch either.
In the end: Because the tail wags the dog so much with the Hall these years, the prospect of a second documentary induction is probably the biggest plus factor for her. With Carole, Tina, and the Go-Go's all having narratives that seem to lead to this moment, the buzz for Kate Bush has been minimal in comparison, and with the seeming inevitability of Foo Fighters and Jay-Z, there just doesn't seem to be room for her in this class. I'd love to see it happen, mainly to see if she does show up at a live ceremony, but it's just too unlikely. Maybe John Sykes will use his power and just say, "Put them all in!" Yeah... Odds of induction: 15%
And with that, we conclude our predictions for the Class Of 2021 for the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. Like a few others, I think there is a strong possibility of there being an Early Influence inductee. I have no idea who, but I'd love to see it be Ella Fitzgerald or the Carter Family, and would hate to see that category repurposed as a Veterans' Committee type of thing. But if Dionne Warwick doesn't make it, maybe the Hall inducts Burt Bacharach & Hal David in lieu of her, possibly to try and build momentum for her return to the ballot next year. My predictions look very similar to a lot of other people's, but hopefully there's some good conversation mixed in with the rationales. Feel free to comment below and give your opinions of my opinions.