Monday, February 21, 2022

Musically Excellent Voices

Several years ago, I was lounging about at home, listening to the Music Choice channel for Solid Gold Oldies.  Mixed in the playlist of songs I'd heard so many times was a song I'd never heard before.  "Hey Jean, Hey Dean" by Dean And Jean (not to be confused with Jan And Dean) came on, and I perked up my ears, as this was something relatively new for me.  It's an upbeat song about throwing a party when you're broke and on the verge of losing everything.  What I really noticed most about the song was that the heavy lifting in it seemed to be done by the background singers, who carried the entire chorus, as well as the fills in between lines of the verses--which kind of makes sense given the song was co-written by Ernie Maresca.  I'd almost bet those background singers had longer careers than either Welton or Brenda, the real names of Dean and Jean--much like Paul And Paula, whose real names were Ray and Jill.

When the Sideman category was created for the Class Of 2000, it was hailed as a huge success for the institution.  The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame was enshrining the session musicians who left an indelible mark on important records, whose styles of playing were almost as unique as fingerprints.  The Hall has inducted drummers, guitarists, bassists, pianists, saxophonists, and even a harmonicist.  But an important category of session contributors that has yet to be seriously acknowledged by the Hall is background singers, and that needs to change.

This is a position I've held even before the documentary 20 Feet From Stardom came out, but it's been amplified by it.  One of the people interviewed in the documentary (I think it was Lou Adler) went so far as to say the background singers were the record at times.  I think my opening anecdote takes that point nearly to the extreme, but there's a lot of truth to that idea.  When you think about the songs of the '50s through the '70s, and even beyond, a lot of the appeal, as well as the invitation to sing along, comes from the background singers.  If I say "Gimme Shelter," what's the thing you most want to extol about that song?  If you said anything other than "Merry Clayton," you're a lying sack a monkey doo.  The debate between Dion's solo career and his work with the Belmonts as being the more worthy of enshrinement has a few different facets to it, but I'd wager the work of the Del Satins on "Runaround Sue" giving it such a Belmonts' feel is a bit of a factor.  And how many of you have to pause yourself to remember that Curtis Lee was not the bass voice on "Pretty Little Angel Eyes"?  Sadly, the world has all but forgotten Arhtur Crier, as well as the rest of the Halos who filled in beautifully on the harmonies.  That's not even touching on the careers of the Blossoms or the Andantes.  Great backing singers make invaluable contributions to the songs we love, by adding harmonies and/or additional rhythmic cadence to a song, even if it's sometimes with nonsense lyrics.  And sometimes, their parts are the most fun to sing along to.

So why has the Hall not enshrined these singers?  Some of it may be as basic as not thinking of them as musicians.  When we talk about musical groups, it includes bands, but if we talk about bands, it won't include all groups.  If that previous sentence made perfect sense to you, then you know what I'm talking about here.  Even until now, I've intentionally refrained from calling backing vocalists "musicians" for this very purpose.  But singers are musicians.  Everyone can sing, right?  No, and even if everyone could, not everyone can sing well enough to make worthwhile contributions to the rock and roll landscape.  You don't need training to be a singer?  A lot of instrument players were self-taught.  Hell, I can play bass guitar.  Not well, mind you, but back in college, when my roommate was at class, I sometimes opened up his case and figured out how to play the bass riff from "With Or Without You."  Not with any official hand positions, but just by pushing the right string down in the right place and strumming it.  (Sorry Brad!)  I even touched on this during the nomination cycle for the Class Of 2012, particularly in reference to the Spinners: if shows like American Idol taught us anything, it's that being a singer does require actual musical talent, and those who are accomplished singers have every right to be called "musicians" as those who specialize in membranophonic, idiophonic, electronophonic, vibraphonic, or other aerophonic instruments.  I.M. Pei may have designed the museum to look more like a guitar than a larynx, but not looking like a spinnet hasn't kept Floyd Cramer from induction.  So, it's not a good reason to keep Lisa Fischer out either.  

Another possible reason may be that the era of backing vocalists has largely passed.  It isn't just because of my own predilections that my examples have largely been from songs recorded before 1970.  Modern music has seen a decrease in the usage of session singers in major hit records, and a lot of the big vocal groups of the past thirty years have been prefab, which the critics, and by extension the Rock Hall, have little to no respect for.  A lot of this is the decrease in demand, as rap and danceable pop music tend not to necessitate harmonizing, and rock bands are supposed to be as self-contained and in-house as possible in their musicianship (or at least have that image).  Some of this decrease is because of the technological advances that have also been able to edge out other varieties of session musicians as well, and some of it is just due to the financial realities of the music industry as it stands now where additional voices are often the easiest and first expenditures to cut when trimming the fat on a recording budget.  As the demand for session musicians seemingly nears extinction, the contributions of auxiliary vocalists appear to no longer be contributing to the evolution or perpetuation of rock and roll.  It seems to be a character trait of a previous generation.

That perception becomes especially detrimental in the context of the current era of the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame.  John Sykes is definitely looking to modernize the Hall, as he seeks to promote his definition of "rock and roll" as the "soundtrack of youth culture."  To make matters worse, these singers, who would have been excellent candidates for the Sideman category, may have an even tougher time becoming Award For Musical Excellence inductees, as that category teeters precipitously close to being little more than an alternative Performer category because the voting bloc won't do the NomComm and board's bidding.  The reimagining of the categories could very easily prevent any more session musicians from getting inducted because all the focus has shifted to using that category to appease Little Steven, Alan Light, Lenny Kaye, or any other member of the Nominating Committee.  Maybe not: we saw Randy Rhoads get inducted last year; however, it's also tempting to argue that Rhoads' induction was to placate Tom Morello and other metalheads on the committee as Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, and Motorhead all perennially languish in the voting tallies.  We don't know, nor might we ever know, but we do know that the ceremony's real-time run time and subsequent broadcast time tend to play a factor in how many inductees we get.  And because of that, the new executions of both this and the Early Influence categories have the potential to stifle further conversations.  Again, hypothetically.  Much of this is still unknown.

What is known is that other than Patti Scialfa of the E Street Band, there is no AME inductee whose primary contribution was as a backing vocalist, and that makes backing vocalists another major oversight on the part of the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame.  Given the Hall's love of Elvis Presley, I would seriously argue for starting with the Jordanaires.  Hell, they were credited on many of his records of the '50s and '60s.  They could even be retconned as a Performer inductee like the Famous Flames and Midnighters were in 2012, but I believe that AME is much more likely given that they did session work for so many singers besides Elvis.  Also, part of me wants to see them in because they'd then be the only grouip to be inducted into the Country Music Hall Of Fame, the Gospel Music Hall Of Fame, the Vocal Group Hall Of Fame, and the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame.  That'd be wicked awesome, in my opinion.  But in addition to the King's singers, let's add the Queen Of Rock And Roll's backing singers, the Ikettes (I know, the irony, but still).  The Cookies would be a great selection too.  So would the Dreamlovers, if we can ever get some love for the Cameo-Parkway legacy.

Since LL Cool J was an Award For Musical Excellence inductee last year, I'm guessing the subcommittees that decide the other categories' inductees won't meet until after the voting deadline passes and all the votes are tallied.  And because this is a category decided entirely by a subcommittee, this is truly a matter where the Rock Hall could simply do it if they wanted to, presumably not answering to anyone.  So while the votes are still being cast and counted, I want to challenge the Award For Musical Excellence subcommittee to take a hard look and strongly consider inducting backing vocalists as part of the Class Of 2022.  It's a glaring oversight that you have the simple, unique, and presumably absolute power to correct.  They've spent their whole careers in the wings and shadows.  Long past time to bring them out and give them a few minutes of the spotlight at your ceremonies.

Sunday, February 6, 2022

Pleasantly Disappointed: The 2022 Ballot

 With the ballot having come out this past week for the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame's Class Of 2022, the general consensus is a resounding, "Eh."  I'll admit, that for me, much of the sentiment on my part is that which I've already expressed.  Most of the acts I love most have already been enshrined, and of the ones that haven't, many I agree probably don't pass the bar, and those that I think do, the Hall has clearly moved on from that era.  If I were a one-man veterans committee, wielding the level of power they gave Little Steven when they first tried the Singles category, you'd think the Hall was really playing catch-up.  Five Satins?  In.  Jesse Belvin?  In.  Jan And Dean?  In.  Lesley Gore?  Retroactively inducted in 1990.  That's just a start.

Anyway, some thoughts on this ballot:


Great minds think alike:

We all knew Eminem was going to be on the ballot, most of us picked Duran Duran and Rage Against The Machine too.  The only other correct prediction I got was Pat Benatar.  I wasn't really thinking she'd show up, but was just expressing my dumbfoundedness from when she previously missed.  It worked.


There's deductive reasoning... there's deja vu.....

One thing about this ballot to note is that there are more return nominees than first timers.  That doesn't happen too often, and that's often why it's so hard to guess the ballot.  The NomComm tries to keep a healthy number of new names on the ballot, and there are still several, but this ratio is a little heavier than it usually gets.

"Nothing against the artists themselves..."

Between the three podcasts hosted by members of the community, when listening to their ballot reveal and reflect episodes this past week, if I'd done a shot every time someone said words to that effect, I'd've been picked up by the police after trying to proposition a statue in a park somewhere.  And every utterance of that sentiment says the same thing that many of us have said: the system is flawed.  Broken?  Nah, bruh.  The Hall was founded by gatekeepers who wanted the number of enshrined small and predominantly at their discretion.  The system is working exactly as designed.  Worthy, revolutionary artists have become ennui because the Hall continues to think too small. They saw how well received the large class was this past year, and they appear to be digging in their heels.  Maybe not.  We don't know how many will get in, but all the press seems to indicate that the Performer category is going to remain narrow for the foreseeable future.  And to address Mark's point, it isn't because of Sporcle, it's because the Performer category has that extra level of validation.  When you go in one of the other categories, you have the approval of the people inside the room.  When you go in as a Performer, you have the approval of not just them, but a larger body of peers.  To be fair, if the ballot simply let voters vote for as many acts as they wanted, the level of respect and validation that these acts actually have would be more accurately reflected.  The Hall's process is so flawed that it has yielded contempt upon itself and its institution--by the institution itself.  The usage of the other categories corroborates that.  And while I am rehashing old discussions and arguments, the point I'm trying to make is, that's why this happens.  Term limits of NomComm members, fresh faces, and even adding diversity to the Assembly Of The Hoagie isn't going to induct the names that deserve it.  In fact, the very opposite is what happens: it tells those acts that they don't matter.  End of sentence.  It'll get new names on the ballot, but it won't put things to right.  Bigger classes are the answer.  Rock and roll spreads out in too many valid and important directions to be kept to classes this small.  Yeah, maybe that means letting in acts like the J. Geils Band, but it also means having Judas Priest and the New York Dolls already in by now too.  To add a clause beginning with "more than" to the question "Do they deserve induction?" presents a faulty paradigm as the reality we're now stuck with.

Which brings us to the idea of wasted space on the ballot.  That's what's being said about the MC5, the New York Dolls, and even Fela Kuti, and on the flipside, the lack of Chaka Khan on the ballot.  If last year was the writing on the wall, as many believe, than the MC5 and possibly the New York Dolls will be getting enshrined in the Early Influence category for their legacy as punk progenitors, while Fela might get enshriend as an Award For Musical Excellence inductee.  So many are asking, "Why bother nominating them when they'll just be inducted in aother category regardless?  It's wasting a spot on the ballot, right?"  Well, I think that's exactly why they did it.  They don't see it as wasting space.  They see it as making one final stab before being graced into the Hall.  It's not a wasted space.  This is how they make it look on paper that they are inducting a higher percentage of nominees every year.  Whether or not they'll do this every year or just until they can reduce the number of Past Nominees who haven't been enshrined to a much lower number, we shall see.  But this is to make the percentages look better.  It's called lying with statistics.  But hey, just as long as the eventual obituary leads with "Rock And Roll Hall Of Famer," right?


Culturally crossed

One of the more interesting side stories since the announcement has been the fan ballot, namely, Fela Kuti going from near top of the heap last year, to currently dead last.  Last year, the Rock Hall site received an unusally high influx of traffic from Africa, all to vote for Fela Kuti in the fan ballot.  And then Fela didn't get inducted.  Those of us in the watching community weren't really fazed or shocked by it.  And to be honest, we thought it was old hat.  We had seen the Dave Matthews Band finish first but fail to get in, and it's not like the top five in the fan ballot have ever all gotten in.  But the Hall is also an American institution.  And we watchers are mostly American, too.  To us, agreeing to receive promotional emails from the Hall as a condition to voting is business as usual, par for the course.  Apparently, that is one way the world wide web is not universal.  The African base that voted for Fela last year was not thrilled.  They felt they'd been played for suckers, and weren't having it a second time.  They didn't appreciate business as usual.  And they let us know how they felt about it.  This puts another spin on the fan ballot.  What the Western world just takes to be backdrop is not seen that way everywhere apparently.  Maybe the Hall should take that into consideration next time they nominate an artist not from the U.S. or U.K.  And maybe lay off the slick-as-slime spiel in their promotions. Doubtful it'll happen though.  All they saw was the number of clicks.  Rock on Fela fans; like the Who, you won't get fooled again.


Step forward, step back

We still don't have a female rapper nominated.  The number of women on the ballot is a lower percentage.  It's a small consolation to see Duran Duran nominated, an act that I'd seen multiple women on Twitter advocating for.  Then again, Duran Duran is a band that the Hall was most likely going to have to deal with eventually, so maybe not progress.  But I don't expound on it as thoroughly as the women in our community.  Go read what Michelle Bourg and Evelyn McDonnell write about it.  Listen to Mary on Hall Watchers.  But it is interesting to see Dolly Parton get nominated.  And less surprising to see Carly Simon, but still unexpected.  Another shot for Dionne Warwick, Kate Bush, Eurythmics, amd Pat Benatar.  No Alanis though.  


It's not a bad ballot.  Some pleasant options.  And also congrats to Beck, Lionel Richie, A Tribe Called Quest, and Devo for getting nominated this time around.  May the fortunes be ever in your favor.